Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Document Type
Year range
2.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases ; 8(SUPPL 1):S299-S300, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1746598

ABSTRACT

Background. Seroprevalence studies are important tools to estimate the prevalence of prior or recent SARS-CoV-2 infections. This information is critical for identifying hotspots and high-risk groups and informing public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a city-level seroprevalence study in Holyoke, Massachusetts to estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and risk factors for seropositivity. Methods. We invited inhabitants of 2,000 randomly sampled addresses to participate between November 5 and December 31, 2020. Participants completed questionnaires measuring sociodemographic and health characteristics, and COVID-19 exposure history, and provided dried blood spots for measurement of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies. To calculate total and group seroprevalence estimates, inverse probability of response weights were constructed based on age, gender, race/ethnicity and census tract to ensure estimates represented the city's population. Results. We enrolled 280 households including 472 individuals. 328 underwent antibody testing. The citywide weighted seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG or IgM was 13.9% (95%CI 7.8 - 21.8) compared to 9.8% based on publicly reported case counts. Seroprevalence was 16.8% (95%CI 5.7 - 28.0) among individuals identifying as Hispanic compared to 8.9% (95%CI 3.0 - 14.7) among those identifying as White. Seroprevalence was 20.7% (95%CI 2.2 - 39.2) for ages 0-19;13.8% (95%CI 5.6 - 22) for ages 20 - 44;9.6% (95%CI 0 - 20.5) for ages 45 - 59;4.8% (95%CI 0 - 10.2) for ages 60 - 84;and 42.9% (95%CI 0 - 100) for ages >85. Conclusion. The measured SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Holyoke was only 13.9% during the second surge of SARS-CoV-2 in this region, far from accepted thresholds for "herd immunity" and highlighting the need for expanding vaccination. Individuals identifying as Hispanic were at high risk of prior infection. Subsequent community-level serosurveys are necessary to guide local responses to the SARSCoV-2 pandemic.

3.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases ; 8(SUPPL 1):S439, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1746392

ABSTRACT

Background. Point-of-care antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to detect Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) represent a scalable tool for surveillance of active SARS-CoV-2 infections in the population. Data on the performance of these tests in real-world community settings will be paramount for their implementation to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. We evaluated the performance characteristics of the CareStartTM COVID-19 Antigen Test (CareStart) in a community testing site in Holyoke, Massachusetts. We compared CareStart to a SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) reference, both using anterior nasal swab samples. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and the expected positive and negative predictive values at different SARS-CoV-2 prevalence estimates. Results. We performed 666 total tests on 591 unique individuals. 573 (86%) were asymptomatic. There were 52 positive tests by RT-qPCR. The sensitivity of CareStart was 49.0% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 34.8 - 63.4) and specificity was 99.5% (95% CI: 98.5 - 99.9). Among positive RT-qPCR tests, the median cycle threshold (Ct) was significantly lower in samples that tested positive on CareStart. Using a Ct less than or equal to 30 as a benchmark for positivity increased the sensitivity of the test to 64.9% (95% CI: 47.5 - 79.8). Performance characteristics of CareStart test results benchmarked against the RT-qPCR gold standard (excluding undetermined results). Examples of images of CareStart rapid test showing variable band intensities. N2 gene RT-qPCR Cycle threshold (Ct) values corresponding to positive and negative CareStart rapid antigen test results for all RT-qPCR positive samples (n=52). Conclusion. Our study shows that CareStart has a high specificity and moderate sensitivity. The utility of RDTs, such as CareStart, in mass implementation should prioritize use cases in which a higher specificity is more important, such as triage tests to rule-in active infections in community surveillance programs.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL